CERM O2 — Building the Future Before You Need It · Jan Heyse
CERM already has a successful enterprise MIS in CERM 7. So why invest heavily in building an entirely new platform at the same time?
For Jan, the answer is simple: because standing still isn’t an option.
At Labelexpo Americas in Chicago, CERM is publicly showcasing O2 for the first time — a cloud-native, multi-tenant MIS platform developed alongside CERM 7 and designed to become an increasingly important part of the company’s long-term future.
Initially, O2 will focus on smaller label converters — typically businesses with perhaps 10–15 employees, one or two presses, a handful of finishing devices, and relatively straightforward production requirements.
But that is only the starting point.
CERM’s ambition is ultimately to develop O2 into an enterprise-level MIS capable of supporting increasingly complex label, packaging, and multi-site environments.
And the architecture matters.
Rather than simply hosting traditional client-server software in the cloud, O2 has been designed as a genuinely cloud-native, multi-tenant platform. For customers, that potentially means faster deployment, easier maintenance, improved scalability, and less dependence on local servers and IT infrastructure.
Of course, building a new MIS while continuing to develop an established flagship product requires considerable investment — and perhaps a little courage.
CERM is very clear that existing CERM 7 customers won’t be forced to migrate. Development of CERM 7 continues, and as O2 evolves, CERM plans to create migration tools that can eventually provide a smoother path between the platforms when — and if — customers decide the time is right.
For Jan, this is about thinking long term.
Not next year.
But 10, 15, and 20 years ahead.
In this INKISH film, Morten B. Reitoft talks with Jan about why CERM decided to build O2, the difference between hosted and truly cloud-native software, where O2 fits alongside CERM 7, and why sometimes the biggest risk for a successful software company is doing nothing.
And yes — we still think O2 is a freaking good name.









No Data Found.
Content for this section will appear here once available